What do we think about this?

Discuss my database trends and their role in business.
Post Reply
aminaas1575
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:05 am

What do we think about this?

Post by aminaas1575 »

While it may seem negative that some artists who don't get 1,000 streams in a 12-month period don't get paid, this doesn't mean that money can't come back to you for your most successful songs. It also doesn't mean that streaming royalties can increase as a result of this rule.

I think the potential result of this will be less quantity and more quality, which we believe is good for consumers. Ultimately, time will tell what the effects of this move are and whether it actually means more revenue for those with legitimate music. There are many arguments that this will benefit the major labels, but I firmly believe that it will new zealand email list benefit the royalty fund and everyone with legitimate streams.

We will have to wait and see how events develop.

Image

Change2: Artificial streaming charges
Starting early next year, Spotify has announced it will charge labels and distributors per track when blatant artificial streaming is detected in their content.

This new deterrent follows the enhancement of our artificial streaming detection technology we launched earlier this year, as well as the creation of the newly formed Music Fights Fraud Alliance .
Spotify has stated that this is the reason for the change:
“Spotify can fight artificial streaming once it occurs on our platform, but the industry would benefit from disincentivizing bad actors from uploading music to Spotify and other streaming services in the first place. Spotify believes this will significantly deter labels and distributors from continuing to distribute the music of known bad actors who attempt to siphon money from honest, hard-working artists. These fees will support ongoing efforts to keep the industry and platform free from artificial activity.”
Post Reply