The first would be to "allow publishers to come together as an industry" to have more leverage in negotiations. The risk is that this could harm smaller players in the market and increase barriers to entry.
The second, the option that the author prefers, is "to develop a charter of good conduct" for the platforms, certainly less restrictive but which has already borne fruit in other areas, notably in television broadcasting.
Ensuring sustainable and quality journalism
Local press and investigative journalism are those that are hungary mobile database both the most vital for democracy but also those that have suffered the most from digital transformations. To survive, many media have rightly launched into data journalism , which has made it possible to reduce the costs of information (less human need) and improve the quality of information thanks to the relevance of the data. Great successes have been noted in the field such as RADAR , which collects a set of public data that can then be analyzed by criteria, particularly geographical, allowing stories to emerge for journalists.
But the local press is the one that is most at risk. Its significant drops in revenue give it little room for financial maneuver. It cannot, like the national press, make economies of scale in information, since the population base is significantly smaller than at the national level. The report considers it unlikely that the local press will be able to find an economic model (unlike the national press) that is self-sufficient .
To restore the imbalance between platforms and publisher
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 3:35 am