Myth 6. You can first create a website and then adapt it
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2025 3:09 am
Myth 6. You can first create a website and then adapt it
Working on accessibility is not something that should be done “on top” of a finished resource. Adapting a website for the visually impaired is one of the stages of development and is no less important than all the others. This statement is especially relevant when working on large projects, because making edits and changes after launch is much more difficult. In addition, it is worth considering that adaptation is a continuous process. It is necessary to avoid situations where developers first add new functionality, publish it, and only then adapt it. It is necessary to act in the reverse order: adapt, make adjustments, and only then publish it.
Myth 7. Adapting services is expensive
Get clients from the site every month
In a guaranteed volume
Read more
The cost of working on the hong kong email list accessibility of large projects will certainly not be low. And what costs should those who want to adapt a resource, for example, a small online store, expect? The most important thing is not to be afraid, because everything depends on the number of user scenarios on the site or in the application. If there are few of them, then you can make the adaptation of the site for the visually impaired for little money. For small projects, developers usually offer lower rates. Most likely, accessibility will become your competitive advantage and the investment will pay off very soon.
Myth 8. A “boxed” solution is suitable for adaptation
Using best practices seems like a surefire solution to many of us, but in reality this axiom does not always work. When it comes to website adaptation, even advanced out-of-the-box solutions and ready-made scenarios may prove ineffective. For this reason, it is better to refuse the services of a developer who offers to use all the best ready-made solutions at once in your project. A competent specialist knows that each algorithm must be individually adapted to the needs of users.
Myth 9. The situation with accessibility is changing for the better
It seems that today the topic of website accessibility is constantly on everyone's lips and the situation is gradually changing for the better. However, unfortunately, there are not many reasons for optimism. A common problem is that not every new feature is adapted for a screen reader. After implementing such options on a website or in an application, people with impaired vision have additional difficulties when working with the service. The screen reader is not able to read elements of a non-adapted design correctly.
The second factor that makes the situation worse can be called excessive adaptation. In the previous point, we already discussed that the desire to apply all the best at once rarely leads to a good result. Often, companies adapt their sites not to ensure the convenience of visually impaired people, but to catch the hype on this. This approach is absolutely ineffective in the long term.
Working on accessibility is not something that should be done “on top” of a finished resource. Adapting a website for the visually impaired is one of the stages of development and is no less important than all the others. This statement is especially relevant when working on large projects, because making edits and changes after launch is much more difficult. In addition, it is worth considering that adaptation is a continuous process. It is necessary to avoid situations where developers first add new functionality, publish it, and only then adapt it. It is necessary to act in the reverse order: adapt, make adjustments, and only then publish it.
Myth 7. Adapting services is expensive
Get clients from the site every month
In a guaranteed volume
Read more
The cost of working on the hong kong email list accessibility of large projects will certainly not be low. And what costs should those who want to adapt a resource, for example, a small online store, expect? The most important thing is not to be afraid, because everything depends on the number of user scenarios on the site or in the application. If there are few of them, then you can make the adaptation of the site for the visually impaired for little money. For small projects, developers usually offer lower rates. Most likely, accessibility will become your competitive advantage and the investment will pay off very soon.
Myth 8. A “boxed” solution is suitable for adaptation
Using best practices seems like a surefire solution to many of us, but in reality this axiom does not always work. When it comes to website adaptation, even advanced out-of-the-box solutions and ready-made scenarios may prove ineffective. For this reason, it is better to refuse the services of a developer who offers to use all the best ready-made solutions at once in your project. A competent specialist knows that each algorithm must be individually adapted to the needs of users.
Myth 9. The situation with accessibility is changing for the better
It seems that today the topic of website accessibility is constantly on everyone's lips and the situation is gradually changing for the better. However, unfortunately, there are not many reasons for optimism. A common problem is that not every new feature is adapted for a screen reader. After implementing such options on a website or in an application, people with impaired vision have additional difficulties when working with the service. The screen reader is not able to read elements of a non-adapted design correctly.
The second factor that makes the situation worse can be called excessive adaptation. In the previous point, we already discussed that the desire to apply all the best at once rarely leads to a good result. Often, companies adapt their sites not to ensure the convenience of visually impaired people, but to catch the hype on this. This approach is absolutely ineffective in the long term.