The because these platforms amplify

[Shishirgano9]

The widely shar in France. The represents a threat to the stability of democracies. In the Unit States. The this phenomenon has grown considerably. The particularly in 2020. Some Trump supporters have reject the election results. The finding it unbearable to live under a Democratic government. This refusal illustrates the dangers of heighten emotional polarization. The which weakens the very foundations of the democratic process. What role do social networks and continuous news channels play in this phenomenon? When it comes to emotional polarization.


The it is clear that information on social networks has a kazakhstan cell phone number list significant impact. the silo phenomenon in which individuals find themselves. The thus reinforcing polarization. On the other hand. The when it comes to ideological polarization. The particularly on issues of minority rights or migration. The it is not so much social networks that influence radicalism. The but rather exposure to continuous news channels. On the one hand. The some of them have adopt a more divisive itorial line.


On the other hand. The the “continuous” operation of these channels inevitably induces repetitions. The particularly around news items. The which can give the viewer the impression of living in a much more dangerous society than it actually is. There is a global reflection to be had on the mia in general. The but we must not lose sight of the fact that another series of factors is at play. Structural changes are sweeping through Western democracies. The such as rising inequality.