Study on the use of methods in projects (Source:Komus)
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 3:10 am
Hybrid project management between classic, lean and agile
There is never one ideal framework. The truth always lies in the happy medium. The right methods at the right time for the right purpose. This is why hybrid project management was developed. Hybrid project management is important in the modern world. This has already been shown by a study on the spread of agility across 900 German companies. It shows that only just under 1/3 of all projects are carried out either fully classically or fully agilely. The rest are carried out in hybrid project management. This is either implemented in phases, e.g. classic planning and agile implementation with Scrum or Kanban, or another option is to mix the respective tools of the method frameworks. For example, classic project plans are mixed with user stories.
hybrid PM study
Choosing the right project management method – Method Finder
As mentioned, choosing the right project management method is essential. In security and commodity brokers email list order to determine the method sensibly, a classification using the Stacey Matrix is recommended. This determines the respective levels of environment and requirements. The respective dimensions are:
Simple systems contain few elements, are stable and predictable. They therefore have a clear behavior. Classic methods are recommended here .
Complicated systems are comprehensible. Their behavior is predictable and it is often just a question of the information available to understand it. The system consists of many logical parts. This can be, for example, a complex algorithm. Here, the classic methods are particularly recommended.
Complex systems are open-ended. Their behavior is unpredictable and the unexpected determines development. The system consists of many elements whose behavior cannot be planned. The system is therefore full of contradictions and always has several possible behaviors. Agile methods are particularly recommended here.
Chaotic systems , on the other hand, are characterized by many elements, extreme dynamics, many relationships and a lack of a cause-effect relationship. It is therefore not possible to form patterns. In this case, more creative methods are recommended, or it is generally not advisable to start such projects and structure them more deeply in order to make them complex or complicated.
There is never one ideal framework. The truth always lies in the happy medium. The right methods at the right time for the right purpose. This is why hybrid project management was developed. Hybrid project management is important in the modern world. This has already been shown by a study on the spread of agility across 900 German companies. It shows that only just under 1/3 of all projects are carried out either fully classically or fully agilely. The rest are carried out in hybrid project management. This is either implemented in phases, e.g. classic planning and agile implementation with Scrum or Kanban, or another option is to mix the respective tools of the method frameworks. For example, classic project plans are mixed with user stories.
hybrid PM study
Choosing the right project management method – Method Finder
As mentioned, choosing the right project management method is essential. In security and commodity brokers email list order to determine the method sensibly, a classification using the Stacey Matrix is recommended. This determines the respective levels of environment and requirements. The respective dimensions are:
Simple systems contain few elements, are stable and predictable. They therefore have a clear behavior. Classic methods are recommended here .
Complicated systems are comprehensible. Their behavior is predictable and it is often just a question of the information available to understand it. The system consists of many logical parts. This can be, for example, a complex algorithm. Here, the classic methods are particularly recommended.
Complex systems are open-ended. Their behavior is unpredictable and the unexpected determines development. The system consists of many elements whose behavior cannot be planned. The system is therefore full of contradictions and always has several possible behaviors. Agile methods are particularly recommended here.
Chaotic systems , on the other hand, are characterized by many elements, extreme dynamics, many relationships and a lack of a cause-effect relationship. It is therefore not possible to form patterns. In this case, more creative methods are recommended, or it is generally not advisable to start such projects and structure them more deeply in order to make them complex or complicated.