It is normal to review the course several times later. Let's say I have a task to work on the target audience: I don't remember how to do it, I am doing it for the first or second time. I turn on the recording of Andrey Gavrikov's module, listen again and do it. I remember that I asked Andrey a lot of questions, and according to him, I really irritated him at that moment.
If we talk about education a little more broadly, then I am amused by promises to “give information without fluff”. Sometimes this fluff is needed to at least learn how to swim. It’s trivial that to swim well, you need to understand HOW to swim. Studying a fundamental course with theory, explanations, etc. and then collecting applied blocks for the task is normal. First, some fluff to immerse yourself in, and then take small (or large) blocks for the task. This is a good format, I think it’s effective.
For beginners who don't understand marketing and lebanon email list digital at all, I recommend taking a broad course on internet marketing to start. And then find "your" subject area, and study narrow skills quite meticulously. Need context? Learn, implement, be a cool dude.
The paradox is that I am now working on larger projects, and finding good contractors is still a big problem. who are the best in a narrow specialization. No matter how hard we try, the labor market in marketing is not yet full and overheated. It is gigantic.
To work as a marketer on a project, you don't necessarily have to be able to do everything manually yourself. I know strategy, contextual advertising. But I'm happy to delegate SEO and SMM. I can't say that I've done nothing at all, but for me it's better to find specialists and set them a specific task.