Effective Group Decision Making Framework
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:46 am
Typically, business meeting participants see decision-making in this way: a certain problem is voiced and everyone expresses their position on it. One proposal gives rise to several new ones, from which more are born, and so on ad infinitum. But then, by some miracle, those who came suddenly find a compromise, one of the options seems most suitable to them, and they choose it. Most meetings are held in this way: company representatives hope that in the end everyone will come to a common denominator that will suit everyone.
But in life, things are different. Opinions are expressed, proposals increase, one thought flows into another and the result is a long silence. Since there are many points of view how you can use this database effectively and they are different, no one knows how to come to an agreement. Someone already wants to leave, but it is impossible. Therefore, the most confident employee, endowed with authority, voices the final decision. Of course, he will have few supporters. When several people are convinced of the correctness of one proposal, and the manager chooses a completely different one, then the event will not only affect the motivation for work, but also the relationships within the team.
Effective Group Decision Making Framework
The world's leading expert, facilitator Sam Kaner, came up with an effective way for a team to make a decision. It consists of dividing the negotiations into 3 stages, each of which should use appropriate methods. Let's consider these steps:
Stage 1: Idea Generation Space
In the past, we have all made some decisions that we were never able to implement. For example, to become more economical, to work more, etc. The intentions were obvious, but the approach did not work, since the wording was general and lacked specifics.
The first stage is necessary to express all possible proposals so that the participants not only express their opinions but also hear their colleagues. Here, your task as a facilitator is to activate non-standard creative thinking in those present in order to distract their minds from the standard useless options.
Awaken people's desire to be heard. After all, as a rule, only a few people are active, and the rest refrain from speaking out of politeness, shyness or for other reasons.
Stage 2: Space of Disputes
If we compare the situation with a brainstorming session, when a large number of proposals appear, some of them will seem quite strange. As a rule, they are quickly criticized and rejected by the participants. A phase comes when people no longer understand what a colleague wants to say, as discomfort has arisen due to a large difference in opinions. The group ceases to look like a team, so in order to avoid quarrels, the manager is forced to make a decision on his own.
The role of the facilitator at this stage is to ensure that employees begin to hear each other, understand each other's position, so that there is an opportunity to reach an agreement. The second step is a time for discussions and the formation of mutual understanding without the need to make a decision.
Case: VT-metall
Find out how we reduced the cost of attracting an application by 13 times for a metalworking company in Moscow
Find out how
Stage 3: Space of Consensus
The final stage involves filtering the proposals. Help the participants filter out the solutions that seem interesting to the group, prioritizing and choosing those that are supported by all members of the meeting. At the same time, you must ensure that each employee agrees to follow the requirements of the option and stand up for it. This is essential, because this is the only way to approach the voting stage and make a decision for the entire team.
By dividing the meeting plan into 3 parts, the organization will be able to find the idea that everyone has participated in developing, understanding the benefits and expressing a willingness to follow its principles in their work.
It's time to learn simple techniques that work for every stage to help your team simplify the search and selection process.
Read also!
But in life, things are different. Opinions are expressed, proposals increase, one thought flows into another and the result is a long silence. Since there are many points of view how you can use this database effectively and they are different, no one knows how to come to an agreement. Someone already wants to leave, but it is impossible. Therefore, the most confident employee, endowed with authority, voices the final decision. Of course, he will have few supporters. When several people are convinced of the correctness of one proposal, and the manager chooses a completely different one, then the event will not only affect the motivation for work, but also the relationships within the team.
Effective Group Decision Making Framework
The world's leading expert, facilitator Sam Kaner, came up with an effective way for a team to make a decision. It consists of dividing the negotiations into 3 stages, each of which should use appropriate methods. Let's consider these steps:
Stage 1: Idea Generation Space
In the past, we have all made some decisions that we were never able to implement. For example, to become more economical, to work more, etc. The intentions were obvious, but the approach did not work, since the wording was general and lacked specifics.
The first stage is necessary to express all possible proposals so that the participants not only express their opinions but also hear their colleagues. Here, your task as a facilitator is to activate non-standard creative thinking in those present in order to distract their minds from the standard useless options.
Awaken people's desire to be heard. After all, as a rule, only a few people are active, and the rest refrain from speaking out of politeness, shyness or for other reasons.
Stage 2: Space of Disputes
If we compare the situation with a brainstorming session, when a large number of proposals appear, some of them will seem quite strange. As a rule, they are quickly criticized and rejected by the participants. A phase comes when people no longer understand what a colleague wants to say, as discomfort has arisen due to a large difference in opinions. The group ceases to look like a team, so in order to avoid quarrels, the manager is forced to make a decision on his own.
The role of the facilitator at this stage is to ensure that employees begin to hear each other, understand each other's position, so that there is an opportunity to reach an agreement. The second step is a time for discussions and the formation of mutual understanding without the need to make a decision.
Case: VT-metall
Find out how we reduced the cost of attracting an application by 13 times for a metalworking company in Moscow
Find out how
Stage 3: Space of Consensus
The final stage involves filtering the proposals. Help the participants filter out the solutions that seem interesting to the group, prioritizing and choosing those that are supported by all members of the meeting. At the same time, you must ensure that each employee agrees to follow the requirements of the option and stand up for it. This is essential, because this is the only way to approach the voting stage and make a decision for the entire team.
By dividing the meeting plan into 3 parts, the organization will be able to find the idea that everyone has participated in developing, understanding the benefits and expressing a willingness to follow its principles in their work.
It's time to learn simple techniques that work for every stage to help your team simplify the search and selection process.
Read also!